Jon Purizhansky | Buffalo News, New York

Vietnam to Japan has become one of the most consequential labour corridors in East Asia. Vietnam brings a young, ambitious workforce; Japan brings an ageing society, shrinking rural communities and deep labour shortages in caregiving, manufacturing, construction and agriculture. The match, on paper, looks perfect. In practice, it has been anything but straightforward. Over the past decade, hundreds of thousands of Vietnamese have headed to Japan in search of higher wages and a chance to build a more secure future. Many arrive under schemes that promise “training” but function as low wage labour pipelines. Others come via complex chains of brokers who add fees, distort information and leave workers indebted before they even set foot in Japan. When a worker has borrowed heavily to pay intermediaries, saying no to abusive conditions is no longer a realistic option. That is not labour mobility; it is a trap. Japan, for its part, genuinely needs these workers. Hospitals and care homes canno...

Across the United Kingdom, employers are confronting a deep and persistent shortage of skilled personnel that domestic recruitment and training alone cannot solve. Labour migration has become the only realistic way to close these gaps at the speed and scale the UK economy requires. The scale of the UK skills crisis Official evidence shows that skills shortages are no longer a marginal problem affecting only a few sectors. Between 2017 and 2022, the number of vacancies that employers could not fill because applicants lacked the right skills rose sharply, and by 2022 more than a third of all vacancies were classified as skills shortage vacancies. Construction provides a stark example, with hundreds of thousands fewer workers than before 2019 and an ageing workforce leaving faster than new talent can be trained, threatening delivery of major housing and infrastructure programmes. Independent estimates suggest that if current shortages persist, the UK could lose tens of billions of pounds ...

Intra African labour migration is up by half since 2010, and the official response is still to write frameworks while people move anyway. Leaders gather to praise the Global Compact for Migration and celebrate Africa as a champion of orderly mobility, but most workers do not feel any more protected than they did a decade ago. The gap between diplomatic language and life on the road from one country to another keeps widening, even as the numbers prove that mobility is no longer a marginal issue but the backbone of the continent’s labour market. The surge in movement is not an accident. It is the predictable outcome of demographic pressure, unemployment at home, and uneven growth between neighbours. Migrant workers go where wages and stability are slightly better, whether or not the paperwork is in order. They are doing the hard work of regional integration in real time, while institutions are still negotiating how to define “safe, orderly and regular” in conference halls far from border...

Intra European labour migration is often presented as one of the European Union’s cleanest success stories, supported by freedom of movement and a mature single market. But the reality is far less tidy, with millions of workers still navigating fragmented rules, opaque hiring channels and uneven workplace conditions. The pattern is familiar. Workers continue moving from lower wage countries in Eastern and Southern Europe toward stronger labour markets such as Germany, the Netherlands and other higher income economies, where employers need staff in logistics, construction, care, hospitality and agriculture. These flows help fill labour shortages and support growth, but they also expose workers to a system that is legal in principle and messy in practice. Europe likes to tell itself that internal mobility is already solved because the legal right to move exists. Yet cross border work and migration still run through agencies, subcontractors and recruitment chains that can leave workers un...

The African Union’s latest Joint Labour Migration Programme, a four year, sixteen million dollar effort dressed up in careful diplomatic language, is supposed to finally make labour migration inside Africa orderly and rights based. It promises better data, smarter policies, and smoother recognition of skills across borders. It reads like progress, yet it feels strangely detached from the everyday reality of the workers it claims to serve. For years, African migrants have crossed borders not because of regional frameworks, but despite their absence. They move to escape unemployment, low pay, or political instability, and they do it through informal brokers and opaque recruitment chains that leave them indebted and vulnerable. Development agencies and regional bodies now repeat the language of protection and portability of social security, but the day to day experience of most migrant workers is still one of confusion, risk, and very little transparency. The new programme acknowledges th...

 Joblio is a global platform created to make cross‑border labor migration transparent, lawful, and humane for both workers and employers. The company was founded by Jon Purizhansky , a lawyer and entrepreneur with deep experience in international labor and refugee issues. Mark Reimann serves as President of Joblio and brings a long career background with the U.S. Department of Homeland Security (DHS), where he worked on immigration, enforcement, and compliance, helping shape his understanding of how to move workers legally and safely. The Problem: A Broken Migration System In the videos and related discussions available via Joblio’s YouTube channel, Joblio’s leaders describe how the traditional system of recruiting migrant workers often relies on opaque middlemen, high illegal fees, and false promises. Workers may sell assets or borrow at high interest just to secure a job abroad, only to find different wages, conditions, or even no job at all when they arrive. Employers, in turn, ...